|
In general a book, no matter how influential it may come to be, is written by a single individual or a group of individuals working together over a brief period of time -- generally no more than a few years. The Bible which has become the greatest of all books, was written by a wide variety of authors over a period of more than 1,200 years. It was not written as a single work, but in fact is a collection of sacred books, including volumes of law, history, poetry, wisdom, and prophecy.
The writing of the last Scriptures did not end the history of the Bible as we know it. Once the Scriptures were written, someone had to determine whether or not they were divinely inspired and thus qualified to be considered as sacred Scripture.
The final New Testament canon, as we know it, was not firmly established until late in the fourth century. This was long after Christ lived upon this earth in human form. To begin with, scriptural truths were passed on by word of mouth. Later they were written down on scrolls. Still later they were copied into books of parchment, papyrus, and finally on paper. Today Scriptures, including the canonized Bible, can be sent electronically on the internet to any place in the world almost instantly.
Through the ages different religious peoples have considered various numbers of Scriptural writings as being authoritative. For example:
It is remarkable to anyone who studies them how Scriptures written over a period of at least 1,200 years by a large number of diverse authors in several languages all bear witness fundamentally to the same understanding of the nature of God. This unity can also be seen in the description of the gospel of Christ. The Old Testament,
in general, shows the preparation for the gospel of Christ. The New Testament sets forth His gospel and closes with the consummation of His gospel.
No one knows how the books of the Hebrew Bible were chosen, but it is fairly certain that the choice of the books was determined by decisions of men. According to the Jewish historian, Josephus, their canon at one time contained only 22 books. It later contained 24 books even though the original canon supposedly could not be changed. Christians, in general, recognize the Hebrew Bible, basically as the Old Testament. They again, however, made changes to the Hebrew Bible canon splitting and renaming a number of the original books. Again there is no indication that this was originated at God's direction. It was again the decisions of men. The canonization of the Hebrew Bible probably took place over a long period of time. Some form of the Hebrew Scriptures was accepted as authoritative at the time of Christ as He frequently referred to passages contained in them. The final canonization of the Hebrew Scriptures was probably complete before the end of the first century A.D.
It was in the second century before the church decided it should have a Christian canon. It took much longer to decide which Scriptures should be included in that canon. Paul primarily used the Hebrew Scriptures to make his assertions concerning the new faith in Christ. There is no record anywhere that Christ wrote anything down or commanded His followers to write anything down. He commanded the Apostles to go out to teach, preach, heal, and baptize, but gave no commands to write.
The Gospel was primarily communicated orally. But as time passed and the hearers became further removed from the original oral sources, the church saw the need to write things down in the interest of permanence. The first known instance in which apostolic writings were accorded scriptural stature occurred in the second century when a gnostic teacher, Basilides, referred to them as "proof-texts" for his arguments. About this same time the church began using the Apostolic writings along with the Hebrew Scriptures when trying to settle internal disputes.
Because the four Gospels came from different communities (and each told the story of Jesus in a slightly different way), attempts were made to combine them into one set of Scripture. This attempt was completed by Tatian, a Syrian teacher, in about 170 A.D. and was considered to be authoritative Scripture in the church until the fifth century. Since there was no objection to changing the manuscripts by blending these together along with some oral tradition
it demonstrates the absence of the sanctity concerning these documents which were later included in the Protestant canon.
Numerous disputes occurred concerning which Scriptures should be considered authoritative and which should be canonized. Finally toward the end of the second century the church defined what the guidelines should be in order to be included in the canon for the official Scriptures. Notice again that this was a decision of men,
not of God. They included the following:
There were still many disputes and disagreements and it was not until late in the third century that the New Testament was actually established. This was many years after the last of the Apostles had died and any manuscripts that they had written were completed. The Apostle, John, is believed to have written the book of Revelation
in the first century about 96 A.D.
Today if one tells a main stream Christian that they believe that God may have other Scriptures which He has given but are not included in the canonized Scriptures, they typically quote the following:
When John wrote these words he did not have the canonized Bible we know today. He was not referring to the canonized Scriptures, but was referring to the book, Revelation, which he was in the process of writing. In Deuteronomy we find similar words:
Does this mean that we should ignore everything that was written after Deuteronomy? No, we must understand what the writer is saying from his perspective. A number of the books we now have in our modern canonized Bible probably were not even known to John when he wrote Revelation.
We have long understood that the thirty-nine books of the Old Testament and the twenty-seven books of the New Testament make up God's complete revelation to man. The Bible does mention other ancient books, however. Joshua 10:13 says,
Among the other books mentioned are the acts of Solomon (1 Kgs. 14:11), the books of Nathan the prophet and Gad the seer (1 Chron. 29:29), and the books of Shemaiah the prophet and Iddo the seer (2 Chron. 12:15). Even more interestingly, Paul mentions a previous epistle: "I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators" (1 Cor. 5:9). Was the epistle telling them not to company with fornicators the original 1 Corinthians? Paul also wrote to the Christians of Colossae, "And when this epistle is read among you, cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and that ye likewise read the epistle from Laodicea" (Col. 4: 16). What is the "epistle from Laodicea?"
Peter warned that some of Paul's writings are hard to understand, and thus were sometimes twisted by false teachers, as "also the other scriptures" (2 Pet. 3:16). Thus he considered Paul's writings to be scripture [inspired writings]. The books accepted in the canon claim inspiration for themselves, and the early Christians verified that ...inspiration by examining their content. These books also received virtual universal acceptance in the early church. Many other ancient books were also considered but rejected from the canon. We rely on the wisdom of the Jews of the first century (not God) to help in deciding which books belonged in the Old Testament canon, and the judgments of numerous early Christians help us in seeing what was accepted and rejected among the writings of the New Testament era.
Among the books circulated by the early Christians, but rejected from the canon were the fourteen books of the Apocrypha. Philo of Alexandria ordered these books to be translated with the Septuagint, the first Greek language translation of the Old Testament, but the Jews never considered them to be Scripture. Most of the books mentioned above, have been lost with the exception of the book of Jasher which has recently been discovered and is also available to a reader who is willing to look for it.
The only way to know true Scripture and to interpret it is in the same way it was received and written, by revelation or inspiration from God through the Holy Spirit.
When we allow human reasoning and decisions to enter into our attempts to understand God's true Scripture it only brings forth division and confusion.
What is Scripture? Where does it come from? In 2 Timothy it tell us:
Here we learn that all Scripture comes from God. It is further implied that anyone who receives true inspiration from God and writes it down has just produced Scripture. It is further interesting to note that it does not say "all canonized scripture". It doesn't even imply "all church authorized scripture". I do not believe that when man chose to make the decision to limit his Scriptures to those selected by a much disputed system of decision making
called canonizing, that God agreed to be bound by those limits. God is boundless, endless, timeless and all knowing and if He really has other Scriptures for us and we choose to ignore them we become the losers because of our own narrow mindedness. When Timothy wrote these words the Scripture as he knew it was not all of the Scripture, even that which would eventually be canonized, i.e. Revelation written by John some time later.
In the book of Amos it tells us that God will not do anything unless He first reveals His plan to His prophets.
Doesn't this tell us that God has His prophets on this earth and has had them here since the earliest of days? If God is doing things in our world and I believe that He is, then there must also be at least one prophet in our world today. In John it tells us?
Isn't Jesus saying that God has worked in our world up to that point? Did God all of a sudden stop working in world and has He taken a sabbath rest of nearly 2000 years? I don't think so. He has been working as many true believers can testify, thus there must be at least one prophet somewhere, though this does not guarantee that a hard-hearted Church and a cold-hearted world would allow them to prophesy. No place in the Scripture does it tell us that a day would come when we could expect never to hear from God again. Rather, the words in Revelation, as well as other places, tell of a coming new heaven and new earth. It speaks of a 1000 year reign. It does tell us in Amos that there would be a day when His Word would be nearly impossible to find.
Today many Christians, including pastors and teachers, seem to be saying "Shut up God! We have our canonized Bible and we don't want to hear anything else that you have to say. This is all we need and all we want". You frequently hear pastors proclaim that the Bible is God's complete Holy Word to mankind. That we should look for nothing more or less from God. Again I do not believe that God is allowing mankind to limit Him to the canonized Scriptures. Could
this be the reason the world will not receive the two witnesses (or prophets) spoken of in Revelation 11. Instead they will celebrate their deaths. There is no indication that there is any Christian supporters for these fellows. Are the Christians unwilling to hear what God is saying through these men because their words are words from God not contained in the canonized Bible? Why don't they give them their support?
In the book of Jude verses 14 and 15 there is a direct quote from the book of 1 Enoch 1:9. The book of 1 Enoch is a non-canonized book of Scripture which God has made available to those who look for it.
This raises the question, if Jude is an authoritative work of scripture, why did he quote an unauthoritative writing for support of a true teaching that he was trying to establish. When an author wants to support his work he does not take quotes from an unauthoritative work or a forgery to support his work. In other words the author does not quote a work which is recognized as unauthoritative if he is trying to persuade and convince. The fact that Jude quoted 1 Enoch
1:9 shows that it was accepted by his readers as authoritative. It was obviously a work which they recognized and approved.
Obviously not all writings which may claim to be scripture are really true scripture. How do we differentiate between the true Scriptures and the impostors? The book of 1 John gives us some clues for testing the writings.
We need to listen to the Holy Spirit as He communicates with us. In order for that to happen we must keep in tune with God through prayer and righteous living in His will. If we earnestly seek to do His will and keep our hearts and minds open to His communication through the Holy Spirit He will be faithful to give us His truths. This, however, should not be our only measuring stick to determine a writing's validity. We need to consider each new "inspired" writing in light of previously inspired writings. If it contradicts something that has previously been established as inspired truth then it is not a valid writing. If it says that something is changed when previously inspired Scriptures tell us that it is unchangeable then it is a false writing. If it tells us, however, that something has changed which previously inspired Scriptures does not call unchangeable we should not close the door on that writing. It could be inspired. In the book of John it tells us:
The key, I believe, in discerning the truth in Scriptures and doctrines is that we follow in God's will for our lives, then we will be able to discern the valid from the invalid through His Holy Spirit. As Christians, are we putting God and His Word in a box or between two confining covers? Are we confining God and His Word to something that we as humans can get our hands around? Have we gone so far as to make God's Word, the Bible, an idol? If not I believe that we are leaning far in that direction. I believe that God's True Scriptures do not contain a cover. Since this author has opened his doors to God's other Scriptures of which many are now readily available through the electronic world in which we
now live, he has received many spiritual blessings, has answered many questions in his mind about God and His plan for humanity, and has been inspired to draw himself more obediently into God's will for his life.
In the studies covered in this web site all of God's Scriptures will be considered and occasionally referenced. The author lovingly requests that you read, study, and ponder these dissertations, then prayerfully seek the guidance from the Holy Spirit in determining your own conclusions concerning them.
|